Frank Rich of The New York Times, writing about Hillary Clinton's campaign, and their lack of a Plan-B post Super Tuesday, and comparing the campaign to the Bush Administration's Iraq War post-invasion planning (or lack of it), wrote
Clinton fans don’t see their standard-bearer’s [slumping campaign] this way. In their view, their highly substantive candidate was unfairly undone by a lightweight showboat who got a free ride from an often misogynist press and from naïve young people who lap up messianic language as if it were Jim Jones’s Kool-Aid. Or as Mrs. Clinton frames it, Senator Obama is all about empty words while she is all about action and hard work.Senator Clinton says, Rich wrote, she's experienced, a hard worker, and that she'll be ready to lead on the first day of her presidency. Well if that's the case, Rich asked, why then does Clinton have a campaign organization that has--in the last 11 primaries and caucuses--been out-hustled by the staff of the "lightweight showboat"?
Labels: 2008 presidential election, Barack Obama, Barak Obama, Hillary Clinton, new york times






